|
Pakistan
earthquake
The
South Asia earthquake struck
Pakistan
hard on
8 October, 2005. The damage was huge with thousands killed,
many more injured, and several million homeless. The UN refugee agency had
stockpiles of life-saving supplies and operational capacity on the ground
where it has worked for 25 years, caring for Afghan refugees. UNHCR
immediately started distributing urgently needed tents and blankets from
its
Pakistan warehouses. Then, a massive airlift from UNHCR's global and
regional stockpiles around the world got underway flying in urgently
needed tents and shelter
materials. On the ground aid workers struggled around the clock to
overcome awesome logistical challenges. Funds from government and private
donors have been dangerously slow to emerge.
It took a good two weeks before the true scale of the
October 8, 2005 Himalayan earthquake became apparent. The
estimated death toll from the quake – which measured around 7.6 on the
Richter scale – climbed inexorably from 10-15,000 during the first day, to
more than 50,000 (and still climbing) after the first two weeks. Although
India was also badly affected, the vast majority of casualties occurred in
Pakistan-Administered Kashmir – where the epicentre was located – and
parts of neighbouring North-West Frontier Province (NWFP).
As the Pakistani and Indian governments, as well as local and
foreign aid agencies, rushed to dig out survivors, treat the injured and
provide for the homeless, each day brought a greater realization of the
sheer magnitude of the destruction: an estimated 15,000 villages affected;
some larger towns such as Muzaffarabad and Balakot virtually flattened;
more than 3 million homeless; 75,000 or more injured – including many who
had still not been seen, let alone treated, two weeks after one of the
most devastating earthquakes in recent history shattered a tranquil Saturday morning in this
remote and stunningly beautiful mountain region.
The UN refugee agency has traditionally played a very minor role –
if any at all – during natural disasters. Its mandate is for refugees –
the product of deliberate persecution or war – with a recently expanded
role for people displaced within their own countries by similar man-made
causes.
However, within a couple of days of the earthquake, it became clear
that UNHCR's services would be needed for the second natural disaster in
under a year (it also launched a major operation after the December 2004
tsunami in
Asia). There were two main reasons for this: firstly, after 25
years managing major operations in
Pakistan
for the care and maintenance – and subsequently repatriation – of millions
of Afghan refugees, it was still one of the biggest operational agencies
on the ground. Secondly, after decades of setting up and runing refugee
camps all over the world, it is the UN system's specialist on the
provision of emergency shelter and camp management.
As hundreds of aftershocks continued to ripple through the scarred
landscape, the need for massive quantities of emergency shelter quickly
became apparent, and UNHCR shifted its initial focus from caring for the
affected Afghan refugees to playing a much wider role in the combined UN
relief effort.
Millions of people in Kashmir and NWFP were shivering out in the
open, night after night, as the relief operation was dogged by a shortage
of helicopters; by bad weather that frequently grounded those helicopters
that were operating; and by the sheer logistical nightmare of trying to
supply massive amounts of aid to one of the highest and most inaccessible
inhabited areas in the world.
UNHCR committed most of its worldwide stock of tents – some 20,000
family tents in all – and began airlifting and trucking them into
Pakistan, along with other vital items, including hundreds of thousands of
blankets, from its regional and local stockpiles in Copenhagen, Amman,
Dubai, Afghanistan, and within Pakistan itself. Then on 19 October, NATO
planes began taking off from the Incirlik base in
Turkey –
the start of a huge airlift of around 10,000 tents, 104,000 blankets and
2,000 stoves – virtually the entire UNHCR stockpile in Turkey.
By the end of Week Two, UNHCR had also sent a number of trained
emergency staff to bolster its existing team in
Pakistan,
and five emergency teams had been deployed across the earthquake zone.
By this stage, UNHCR – along with virtually all other agencies
(both UN and non-governmental) – was being hampered by a very slow initial
response by both governmental and private donors.
The tsunami (which may have killed more people, but produced fewer
homeless in far more accessible terrain), and subsequent hurricanes and
other natural disasters during 2005, seemed to have drained some of the
willingness to respond to the misery unfolding in a remote corner of South
Asia. Even though the earthquake and its aftermath were affecting millions
of people, and an adequate response to the catastrophe was clearly way
beyond the initial capacity of the Pakistan army and the combined efforts
of all the world's major aid agencies, the international response was
sluggish.
As the days went by, more and more urgent pleas for greater
generosity came out from senior UN officials as well as NGOs – especially
the medical agencies which were warning that minor injuries were going
septic, amputations were on the increase, and unnecessary deaths were
occurring.
Another potential big killer – the shortage of shelter materials
and sufficient means to transport them, especially helicopters, was also
being highlighted with increasing urgency as temperatures fell to around
zero at night, and the spectre of a full-blown Himalayan winter lurked
just around the corner. The underlying message: a slow response, in terms
of funding and logistical aid was already costing lives. If donor apathy
continued, it would cost many more. |